🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. Recently, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and gather the crop and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which enable relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, adding that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.